Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta agricultura. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta agricultura. Mostrar todas las entradas

miércoles, abril 15, 2009

Porqué la crisis alimentaria aún no se ha ido - y puede que empeore

Nos hemos concentrado mucho en analizar la crisis financiera internacional, pero muchos otros sistemas están en crisis, especialmente el suministro mundial de alimentos. Y quienes lo han recordado ultimamente no son otros que los economistas en el Departamento de Agricultura de Estados Unidos (USDA). Ojalá el estudio que hicieron lo pudieran leer en lugares como la Presidencia, el Sagarpa y el Cisen. Podríamos vivir sin petróleo, pero sin alimentos no duraríamos mucho. Y una crisis de su abasto sería lo peor que nos pudiera suceder. Copio de The Atlantic Food:

Apr 15 2009, 11:08 am

The World Food Crisis and U.S. Agriculture

The intrepid economists at USDA* have published an analysis of what the current rise in food prices means for U.S. agriculture. Their report provides a broad overview of the causes and effects of higher food prices. The bottom line: the long-term effects are still uncertain but they will surely be worse for farmers in developing countries than for our own farmers.

But shouldn't the USDA also be concerned about what will happen to Third World farmers? If we are part of a global food system, don't we have some global responsibility?

*The USDA Economic Research Service (ERS) has produced an interactive report summarizing the kinds of research it does. See if you agree with me that the ERS does invaluable work and performs a great public service.


lunes, diciembre 31, 2007

¿Renegociar el TLC? ¿A quién sacrificamos?

La Jornada, organizaciones de izquierda, y ahora gobernadores como Lázaro Cárdenas Batel quieren que se renegocie el capítulo agrícola del TLC con Estados Unidos y Canadá, para evitar que se quiten los aranceles a la importación de maíz y frijol.

Cuidado, si su deseo se les cumple y EU y Canadá aceptaran renegociarlo no sería sin consesiones. Seguramente pedirían que se pusieran aranceles a otros productos agrícolas mexicanos... ¿y a cuáles se los pondríamos? ¿Al exitoso aguacate de Michoacán, al exitoso café de Veracruz, a la exitosa naranja de Nuevo León...? Alguien que sí compite con nuestros socios del norte perdería su liderazgo que se ha ganado a pulso. ¿Eso quiere La Jornada, el PRD, los gobernadores? Nada es gratis en la vida, y tampoco lo sería la renegociación del TLC... Pensarlo de otra forma solo es ingenuidad, por decirlo de forma cortés.

jueves, noviembre 29, 2007

2008: porqué el libre comercio en la agricultura no será justo en el TLC



Otra pregunta y respuestas del debate de ayer en You Tube - CNN.

Ganen demócratas o republicanos, el gobierno de Estados Unidos no dejará de subsidiar a sus agricultores. ¿Competir con la agricultura americana así? Podriamos competir con la agricultores, pero con el Tesoro de EU, más que imposible.

miércoles, septiembre 19, 2007

Los altos costos del etanol

El New York Times publica hoy una editorial sobre este polémico tema, cuyo punto central creo es éste:

"...The economics of corn ethanol have never made much sense. Rather than importing cheap Brazilian ethanol made from sugar cane, the United States slaps a tariff of 54 cents a gallon on ethanol from Brazil. Then the government provides a tax break of 51 cents a gallon to American ethanol producers — on top of the generous subsidies that corn growers already receive under the farm program..."

Los aranceles y los subsidios distorsionan el mercado libre, y distorsionan así mucho más. Es hora de quitarlo, porque de lo contrario veremos que el aumento en los cereales desatarán una inflación terrible. La inflación es como la guerra: es facil iniciarla, pero muy difícil detenerla.

martes, septiembre 04, 2007

Muro fronterizo obliga a agricultores de Estados Unidos cultivar en México



Lo increíble: debido al racismo de los legisladores de derecha (casi todos republicanos), los pragmáticos agricultores estadounidenses se han visto obligados - por las leyes de la economía - a traer sus cultivos a México, y hasta a Centroamérica. Si los campesinos no vienen a mí, la empresa agrícola va a ellos. Bravo! Que construyan el muro y que ahí lo dejen! Como dicen en mi casa: nadie sabe para quien trabaja. Ojalá los partidos puedan ver ésto, y reflexionar en que lo que necesitamos es más inversión extranjera, no sólo en el campo, sino hasta en la generación de electricidad, que la CFE no tiene capacidad de responder ante la creciente demanda del país, y eso nos puede llevar a terribles cuellos de botellas en el desarrollo nacional. Pero bueno, esta es una gran noticia. Copio del New York Times de hoy:

September 4, 2007

American Farmers Are Crossing the Border for Labor

CELAYA, Mexico — Steve Scaroni, a farmer from California, looked across a luxuriant field of lettuce here in central Mexico and liked what he saw: full-strength crews of Mexican farm workers with no immigration problems.


Farming since he was a teenager, Mr. Scaroni, 50, built a $50-million business growing lettuce and broccoli in California’s Imperial Valley, relying on the hands of immigrant workers, most of them Mexicans and many probably in the United States illegally.


But early last year he began shifting part of his operation to rented fields here. Now some 500 Mexicans tend his crops in Mexico, where they run no risk of deportation.


“I’m as American red-blood as it gets,” Mr. Scaroni said, “but I’m tired of fighting the fight on the immigration issue.”


A sense of crisis prevails among American farmers who rely on immigrant laborers, more so since legislation in the United States Senate failed in June and authorities announced a crackdown on employers of illegal immigrants. An increasing number of farmers have been testing the alternative of raising crops across the border where many of the workers are, according to growers and lawmakers in the United States and Mexico.


Western Growers, an association representing farmers in California and Arizona, conducted an informal telephone survey of its members in the spring. Twelve large agribusinesses that acknowledged having operations in Mexico reported a total of 11,000 workers here.


“It seems there is a bigger rush to Mexico and elsewhere,” said Tom Nassif, the Western Growers president, who said Americans were also farming in countries in Central America.


Precise statistics are not readily available on American farming in Mexico, because growers seek to maintain a low profile for their operations abroad. But Senator Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat, displayed a map on the Senate floor in July locating more than 46,000 acres that American growers are cultivating in just two Mexican states, Guanajuato and Baja California.


“Farmers are renting land in Mexico,” Ms. Feinstein said. “They don’t want us to know that.”


She predicted that more American farmers would move to Mexico for the ready workforce and lower wages. Ms. Feinstein favored a measure in the failed immigration bill that would have created a new guest worker program for agriculture and a special legal status for illegal immigrant farm workers.


In the past, some Americans have planted south of the border to escape spiraling land prices and to ensure year-round deliveries of crops they can produce only seasonally in the United States. But in the last three years, Mr. Nassif and other growers said, labor uncertainties have become a major reason why more farmers have shifted to Mexico.


While there are benefits for Mexico, as American farmers bring the latest technology and techniques to the rich soil of its northern regions, American farm state economists say that thousands of middle-class jobs supporting agriculture are being lost in the United States. Some lawmakers in the United States also point to security risks when food for Americans is increasingly produced in foreign countries.


Tromping through one of his first lettuce crops near Celaya, an agribusiness hub in the state of Guanajuato, Mr. Scaroni is more candid than many farmers about his move here. He had made six trips to Washington, he said, to plead with Congress to provide more legal immigrants for agriculture.


“I have a customer base that demands we produce and deliver product every day,” he said. “They don’t want to hear the excuses.” Without legal workers in California, he said, “I have no choice but to offshore my operation.”


The Department of Labor has reported that 53 percent of the 2.5 million farm workers in the United States are illegal immigrants, though growers and labor unions say as much as 70 percent of younger field hands are illegal.


As American authorities tightened the border in recent years, seasonal migration from Mexico has been interrupted, demographers say. Many illegal farm laborers, reluctant to leave the United States, have abandoned the arduous migrant work of agriculture for year-round construction and service jobs. Labor shortages during harvests have become common.


Some academics say warnings of a farm labor debacle are exaggerated. “By and large the most dire predictions don’t come true,” said Philip Martin, an agricultural economist at the University of California, Davis. “There is no doubt that some people can’t count on workers showing up as much as they used to,” he said. “But most of the places that are crying the loudest are exceptional cases.”


But some recent studies suggest that strains on the farm labor supply are real. Steve Levy, an economist at the Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy in Palo Alto, compared unemployed Americans with illegal immigrant workers in the labor market. “The bottom line,” he concluded, “is that most unemployed workers are not available to replace fired unauthorized immigrant workers,” in part because very few of the unemployed are in farm work.


Mr. Scaroni said he started growing in Mexico reluctantly, after seeing risks to his American operations. At peak season his California company, Valley Harvesting and Packing, employs more than a thousand immigrants, and all have filled out the required federal form, known as an I-9, with Social Security numbers and other identity information.


“From my perspective everyone that works for me is legal,” he said. But based on farm labor statistics, he surmises that many of his workers presented false documents.


An impatient man in perpetual motion, Mr. Scaroni marches through his fields shouting orders to Mexican crew leaders in rough Spanish while he negotiates to buy new trucks in Mexico on a walkie-talkie in one hand and to sell produce in the United States on a cellphone in the other.


Frustrated with experts who say that farmers with labor problems should mechanize, he plunges his hands into side-by-side lettuce plants, pulling out one crisp green head and one that is soggy and brown. After his company invested $1 million in research, he said, “We haven’t come up with a way to tell a machine what’s a good head and what’s a bad head.”


He also dismisses arguments that he could attract workers by raising wages, saying Americans do not take the sweaty, seasonal field jobs. “I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that if I did that I would raise my costs and I would not have a legal workforce,” Mr. Scaroni said.


Still, transferring to Mexico has been costly, he said. Since the greens he cuts here go to bagged salads in supermarkets, he rigidly follows the same food safety practices as California. Renting fallow Mexican land, he enclosed his fields in fences and installed drip irrigation systems for the filtered water he uses.


He trained his Mexican field crews to wear hair nets, arm sheaths and sanitized gloves, and held drills on the correct use of portable toilets. In the clean-scrubbed cooling house, female workers in white caps scrutinize produce for every stray hair and dirt spot.


By now about one-fifth of Mr. Scaroni’s operation is on five farms approaching 2000 acres in Guanajuato. A few of his Mexican employees came from California, like Antonio Martínez Aguilar, a seasoned field manager who worked there for fifteen years but could never get immigration documents.


“I tried everything, but there wasn’t anything anyone could do to make me legal,” Mr. Martínez said.


Negotiated among growers and unions over seven years, the agricultural measure in the failed immigration bill, known as AgJobs, had wider bipartisan support than the bill as a whole, lawmakers said. Its supporters have said they hope to bring it before Congress this fall, perhaps attached to the farm bill. It was hurt by the resignation of Senator Larry Craig, the Idaho Republican who was one of its chief sponsors.


Mr. Scaroni expects recover his start-up costs because of the lower wages he pays farm workers here, $11 a day as opposed to about $9 an hour in California, although Mexican workers are less productive in their own country, he said.


“It’s not a cake walk down here,” he said. “At least I know the one thing I don’t have to worry about is losing my labor force because of an immigration raid.”


viernes, mayo 11, 2007

Porqué los alimentos orgánicos son mejores



Un vídeo miu informativo que muestra porqué los alimentos orgánicos son mejores para los agricultores, los consumidores, y el medio ambiente....

jueves, marzo 15, 2007

La competencia agrícola será imposible

En 2008 se abren todos los aranceles en materia agrícola en el mercado norteaméricano, en el marco del Tratado de Libre Comercio entre México, Estados Unidos y Canadá.

Hoy publica Andrew Sullivan que pone todo en perspectiva: El Senado de Estados Unidos decidió dar 15 billones de dólares en subsidios a los agricultores americanos, adicionales a los 8 billones que ya da anualmente. ¿Pueden competir los agricultores mexicanos con sus contrapartes? Quizá, pero... ¿contra los subsidios? Jamás. La apertura del 2008 es una apertura amañada, contra la que no podremos competir aunque desde 1994 nos hubieramos preparado. Y ésto producirá más crisis en el campo mexicano, más tierras que se urbanizarán ante la caída en los precios debido a nuestro mercado inundado por productos subsidiados, más desempleo rural, y más, mucha más migración al norte.

Ni con todas las ganas de Alberto Cárdenas ni de Felipe Calderón (ni del Congreso) se podrá hacer algo si no se logran eliminar esos subsidios en EU. Pero ni yendo a la OMC y ganando el caso sucederá. El Senado americano no dejará de subsidiar a los influyentes agricultores de allá. Mi recomendación: no renegociar el capítulo agrícola del TLC, sino cerrarlo, sacarlo del tratado. ¿Radical? seguro, pero creo es la única solución a la vista...

PD. Otra posibilidad: ¿Sabrán los estadounidenses que con sus impuestos pagan la ineficiencia de sus agricultores, el empobrecimiento del campo mexicano y la migración de los mexicanos hacia Estados Unidos? No lo creo. ¿Es hora de decirselos no creen?