"The charges appear in an article in the French journal Golias under the headline "The Strange Methods of Dr Anatrella." Lamarca also claims to have informed the then-archbishop of Paris, Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger, of Anatrella's conduct. While the patient says he was promised that Lustiger would take action on the allegations, it was his finding that none was taken..."

Como siempre, parece ser que la autoridad encubre la violencia del depredador y se olvida de la víctima. Andrew Sullivan hace una pertinente pregunta:
"Whether the suit has any merit we will have to see. Anatrella is innocent before being deemed guilty. But one beings to wonder. How much homophobia - especially clerical homophobia - is actually created and sustained by closeted gay men in the Church hierarchy?
En la imagen, el terrible inquisidor español Tomás de Torquemada.
You can see how a gay man, given great power by a church wedded to the idea of the evil of homosexuality, might feel the need to be even more aggressive in fighting the notion that it is simply another way of being human. It does not surprise me how many ferociously anti-gay figures are gay themselves, or have family relatives who are gay. Their way of coping with reality is to lash out at those others who simply represent the contradiction of their ideology or theology: sane, adjusted happy gay couples. We are their targets. But in the end, they only truly victimize themselves."
Y... por qué Tomás de Torcuemada perseguía a judíos en la edad media, siendo él de familia judía? Por la misma razón que parece ser Anatrella persigue a homosexuales: odio hacia sí mismo.
1 comentario:
Con argumentaciones tan sólidas como estas se excluyó a la homosexualidad del catálogo de psicopatologías.
Publicar un comentario